Single and combined genotoxicity effects of six pollutants on THP-1 cells.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the single and combined genotoxic effects of six food pollutants (Chrysoidine G, Sudan I, acid orange II, malachite green, acrylamide, and potassium bromate) on THP-1 cells through comet assay. The results of the single tests indicated that the pollutants increased the percentage of tail DNA (% tail DNA) in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, the % tail DNA values induced by synthetic colorants (Chrysoidine G, Sudan I, acid orange II, and malachite green) were significantly higher than those by acrylamide or potassium bromate at most concentrations. In the combined tests, Chrysoidine G (422 µmol/L) or acrylamide (400 µmol/L) was mixed with different concentrations of the other five pollutants respectively. In the first combined tests, most mixtures significantly increased the % tail DNA values with the exception of Chrysoidine G and acid orange II. In the second tests, there were no significant differences in the % tail DNA values between the single and combined tests at most cases.

The risk of active sensitization to PPD.

Para-phenylenediamine (PPD) and para-aminoazobenzene are strong sensitizers. By the patch test procedure, the patient may be sensitized to these agents. Combined testing of para-compounds may increase the risk of active sensitization. We studied the % of positive patch test reactions and their relevance. In order to assess the risk of active sensitization, we compared the % of relevant reactions of both early (2/3 days) and late (7 days) reactions. We also compared the percentage of positive patch test reactions to PPD and their relevance if simultaneously tested with para-aminoazobenzene. We studied the patch test reactions to PPD in the routine series in 2058 patients. In a group of 678 patients we tested PPD and para-aminoazobenzene simultaneously. 4.3% and 3.1% of the patients reacted to PPD, respectively, with and without simultaneous testing with para-aminoazobenzene. We estimated the reactions as relevant in 21.1% and 39.7%, respectively, with and without simultaneous testing with para-aminoazobenzene. We considered none of the late reactions as relevant. We found a high proportion of relevant patch test reactions to PPD, but sensitization to PPD by the patch test procedure is a risk. We state that routine series should not contain PPD. The high number of irrelevant late positive reactions strongly suggests active sensitization. Moreover, PPD is not a ubiquitous allergen and can be tested on a non-routine basis if industrial exposure to para-compounds is suspected or if a specific localization (e.g., head or feet) prompts the testing of PPD. Testing PPD combined with para-aminoazobenzene does lead to a slight increase in positive reactions to PPD (p<0.25) and to an increase in irrelevant reactions (p<0.10).

Experimental study on skin sensitization potencies and cross-reactivities of hair-dye-related chemicals in guinea pigs.

In screening patch testing of hairdressers with occupational contact dermatitis, multiple positive reactions to hair dye-related chemicals, such as p-phenylenediamine (PPD), p-toluenediamine x 2HCl (PTD) and p-aminophenol (PAP), a fabric dye p-aminoazobenzene (PAB), and a tar dye Sudan III, were frequently encountered. To investigate individual skin sensitization potency and the cross-reactivities among above chemicals, a guinea pig maximization test with the above 5 chemicals was performed. In each group, 6 animals were induced with one of the chemicals at 0.1% concentration by intradermal injection and at 1.0% by topical application. The animals were challenged with all 5 chemicals in concentrations of dilution by 10 from 0.1% to 0.001%. Under the conditions of 0.1% challenges, similar sensitization potencies were observed in PPD (6/6), PTD (6/6), PAP (5/6) and PAB (6/6) groups, but no positive reactions were elicited in the Sudan III group. The cross-reactivities to PPD were confirmed in the animals challenged with PTD (6/6), PAP (6/6), PAB (6/6) and Sudan III (3/6). In the PTD-induced group, positive responses to cross-challenges were elicited by PPD (5/6), PAP (3/6), PAB (5/6) and Sudan III (1/6). The cross-reactivities to PAP were observed only with PPD (2/5) and PAB (5/5). PAB-induced animals responded only to PPD (1/6). The results indicate that all these chemicals except Sudan III are strong sensitizers. Their cross-reactivities are different in sensitized conditions, respectively. The cross-reactivities to PPD were higher than those to PTD, PAP and PAB.

[Lichenoid contact dermatitis from the ink of a red pen]. / Dermite de contact lichénoïde à l'encre rouge d'un stylo.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous cutaneous inflammatory reactions have been reported in literature, after using red dyes; most of them are lichenoid reactions and occur after tattooing. Few reports have mentioned inflammatory complications after using red ink. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old woman was examined for papular erythematous, pruritic lesions on the back of her left hand. They developed within the area of a red inked pen writing, a few days before. There was an isomorphic reaction on the cheek which was in contact with the hand during sleep. Diagnosis of lichen reaction to red ink was made, and histologically confirmed on the hand. DISCUSSION: We report the first case to our knowledge of lichen reaction to red inked pen, which can be compared to hypersensitivity reactions to red pigment reported in literature. A Koebner phenomenon by friction, usual with lichen, is possible, but doesn't explain the reaction on the cheek. A contact dermatitis to red pigment of ink can also be suggested, although mostly eczema-like reactions have so far been reported; it seems moreover that lichenoid reactions reported only occur after intradermal injection of pigment during tattooing. This contact mechanism would nevertheless explain both localizations of lichen reaction in our patient.

Cross-sensitizations between azo dyes and para-amino compound. A study of 236 azo-dye-sensitive subjects.

Combined sensitizations to different azo dyes, probably based both on true cross-sensitization and on simultaneous positive reactions, have frequently been described. However, since azo dyes are included in the standard series in a minority of countries, the case studies considered comprise, with few exceptions, a small number of subjects. The aim of our study was to investigate cross-reactions between different azo dyes and para-amino compounds in azo-dye-sensitive subjects, to study the clinical aspects of azo dye dermatitis, to assess the relevance of sensitization to azo dyes, and to relate the pattern of cross-sensitizations to the chemical structure of the different dyes. Out of 6203 consecutively tested patients, 236 were sensitized to at least 1 of 6 azo compounds employed as textile dyes, included in our standard series. 107 subjects reacted to Disperse Orange 3 (DO3), 104 to Disperse Blue 124 (DB124), 76 to p-aminoazobenzene (PAB), 67 to Disperse Red 1 (DR1), 42 to Disperse Yellow 3 (DY3), and 31 to p-dimethylaminoazobenzene (PDAAB). Co-sensitizations to para-phenylenediamine were present in most subjects sensitized to DO3 (66%) and PAAB (75%), in 27% and 36% of DR1 and DY3-sensitive subjects, and only in 16% of subjects sensitized to DB124. Apart from the hands and the face, the neck and the axillae were the most frequently involved skin sites. Whereas the involvement of flexural areas was mainly connected with sensitization to DB124, in patients with hand dermatitis and in those working as hairdressers, sensitization to DO3 and PAAB was more frequent. Moreover, in the former patient group, a history of textile dye allergy was most frequently obtained. Out of 33 patients tested with an additional textile dye series, only 5 subjects reacted to anthraquinone dyes. Cross-sensitizations between azo dyes and para-amino compounds can partially be explained on the basis of structural affinities.

Coarse fishing and risk of urothelial cancer.

In a case-control study of 240 men with urothelial cancer diagnosed in 1984 and 240 matched control subjects smoking and coarse fishing were found to be significantly associated with the disease. Duration of exposure to the chrysoidine azo dyes used to stain maggot bait was the most important predictor of risk; 5% of our cases were attributable to exposure to this dye. Chrysoidine dyes are chemically similar to some putative mammalian carcinogens and a constituent of hair dyes.

[Activities of several enzymes of glycolysis and of the glucose shunt in the Albert hepatoma of mouse (author's transl)]. / Die Aktivität einiger Enzyme der Glykolyse und des Glukose-shunt in Albert-Hepatom der Maus.

The activities of key enzymes of glycolysis and of the glucose shunt as well as the capacity of lactic acid formation were determined in the high-speed tissue supernatant of the transplantable Albert hepatoma of mouse [originally produced by oral application of chrysoidin (2,4-diaminoazobenzene) on C57 Black mice]. Furthermore, the particle-bound hexokinase activity was determined. The following results were obtained: In the hepatoma the activities of aldolase, pyruvate kinase and lactic dehydrogenase are hardly altered compared with normal liver. The activities of hexokinase and phosphofructokinase are increased 2,5-fold, those of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 2-fold. The capacity for lactic acid formation from glucose is 7 times as high in the hepatoma supernatant. Strong differences emerge from the liver-to-hepatoma relationship in terms of intracellular distribution of the hexokinase (total homogenate 1 : 5, supernatant 1 : 2,5 and particle-bound hexokinase activity 1 : 18). A summarizing consideration of all the results obtained so far for the Albert hepatoma shows that this malignoma departss in several biochemical parameters from the "Molecular Correlation Concept" maintained by Weber, providing more evidence for the individuality of tumors.